|
User Reviews for
Hamilton Beach BrewStation 47454 Coffee Maker
|
|
EXCELLENT
|
|
Reviewed
January 28 2007 1:52:29 AM
5
out of
5
users found this recommendation helpful.
|
|
Ratings:
5
out of 5
Pros:
Great Machine |
|
|
|
| Cons:
No cons known yet I had an original...and the problem with leaking has been fixed. This one has a programmable timer to allow you to perk a fresh pot each morning. You can vary from iced coffee, to decaf, to a smaller quantity. Just an overall EXCELLENT perfect machine!
|
|
|
|
|
Needs Work
|
|
Reviewed
July 22 2007 10:10:02 AM
4
out of
4
users found this recommendation helpful.
|
|
Ratings:
2
out of 5
Pros:
Easy and Coffee stays fresher |
|
|
|
| Cons:
Very hard to clean, Great idea on this maker but it needs help. It always looks dirty. (the plastic stains easily) This maker is plastic and after a few months it starts to leak, and there's no stopping it. Mine didn't last 6 months. My sister-in-law had the same problems.
|
|
|
|
|
Still Leaking
|
|
Reviewed
August 22 2008 3:21:06 PM
0
out of
0
users found this recommendation helpful.
|
|
Ratings:
2
out of 5
Pros:
like the push-button dispenser, timer, coffee tastes good |
|
|
|
| Cons:
after awhile, began leaking out the bottom, also messy to pour in...spout leaks I will not buy this brand again. The features are great, but what's the point if it doesn't last? Like the original, this updated model leaks out the bottom after awhile. We have to have 2 paper towels under it to protect the counter each time. And, it's more expensive than other models that probably last longer. I'm looking today to buy another brand....Hope Hamilton Beach can fix these leaking problems.
|
|
|
|
|
Short Lifespan - Avoid!
|
|
Reviewed
June 5 2008 11:51:36 AM
0
out of
0
users found this recommendation helpful.
|
|
Ratings:
3
out of 5
Pros:
Convenience |
|
|
|
Cons:
Failed after 12 months This was our second Hamilton-Beach BrewStation, a coffeemaker we selected due to its unique design, i.e., no carafe.
However, I would not recommend. Our first one lasted about 18 months, this latest/second one only 12 months. The first failure after 18 months could have been attributed to a "lemon", but two in a row with such a short lifecycle??? No way.
|
|
|
|